Matthew 1:1-16
Matthew and John were
Jesus’ apostles, while Mark and Luke were not.
As a result each one provides a different perspective into Christ’s
ministry. Matthew writes from firsthand
experience as he remembers the various events as a traditional Jewish man. John focuses more on Jesus’ teachings than on
the events themselves. Mark writes from
the perspective of a young boy trying to understand what was going on, while
Luke writes as an outsider, a Greek, trying to get all the information to share
with others.
In Navajo culture, family
ties are very important so almost meeting includes a time of making family
connections clear. Family had a similar
importance in Jewish culture, so Matthew starts out with a listing of the
genealogy of Christ. While it may seem a
little tedious to read, it is critical in establishing Jesus’ credentials to be
the Messiah. Messiah had to be a
descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Judah, and qualified as an heir to the
throne of David.
Matthew’s record establishes those qualifications,
listing the genealogy of Joseph, the person the Jews would most consider,
supposing him to be the father. Luke, as
a Greek, was more concerned with his actual genetic heritage and lists the genealogy
of Mary, his actual mother, and thus the genealogies differ.
“The book of the generation of Jesus
Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat
Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; And Judas begat Phares and Zara
of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; And Aram begat
Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; And Salmon
begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; And
Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had
been the wife of Urias; And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and
Abia begat Asa; And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram
begat Ozias; And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat
Ezekias; And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat
Josias; And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried
away to Babylon: And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat
Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud
begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat
Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat
Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary,
of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.” (Matthew 1:1-15)
Joseph’s
family was the royal line that had ruled Judah from the time of David until Israel
went into captivity in 605 BC. Besides
the list of kings, Tamar, Judah’s daughter in law, Rahab, the Harlot from
Jericho and Ruth the Moabite girl are especially significant, as well as
Zerubabbel, the first governor after Judah was allowed to return to the land of
Israel after the captivity in Babylon.
Mary was a
descendent of David’s son Nathan, rather than of Solomon, and the genealogy in
Luke follows her family, referring to Joseph in Luke 3:23 as the supposed
father of Jesus, and the son in law(son) of Heli.
“So all the generations from Abraham
to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into
Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto
Christ are fourteen generations.” (Matthew 1:17)
While there
were fourteen generations of the family in each of the listed time periods,
there was considerable difference in the length of the periods. The time from Abraham to David was over a
thousand years while the time from David to the Babylonian captivity was only a
little over five hundred years, as was the time from Babylonian captivity until
the birth of Christ.
I'm interested to see what you say as you go through Matthew. Pointing out the differing genealogical records is very important, because it tends to be a sticking point with some who point out that they don't agree and therefore the Bible is in error. Good post.
ReplyDeleteThere are several things I have discovered in my studies that I believe support the biblical record. I hope what I have learned over the years will be helpful. Thanks, Ian.
Delete