Matthew
5:27-37
“Ye have heard that it was said by
them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That
whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her
already in his heart.
And if thy right eye offend thee,
pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of
thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into
hell. And if thy right hand offend thee,
cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of
thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into
hell. ” (Matthew 5:27-30)
Laws can
only deal with actual physical actions, but true righteousness comes from the
heart. While the law forbid committing
adultery, Jesus said that just daydreaming about it was in fact adultery in the
heart and God looks on the heart. Since we can’t see what is in aperson’s heart
until he acts on it, we cant judge whether a person is righteous or not. In I Corinthians 4:5, Paul commanded, “Therefore judge nothing before the time,
until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of
darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall
every man have praise of God.”
If a person
cannot control his eye, it would be better to put it out so his sin did not
cause him to go to hell than to wind up in hell because of lust. In the same way, it would be better to have a
hand cut off and go through life without it than to go to hell because one
couldn’t or wouldn’t control his hands.
The earthly mutilation would be only temporary, but hell is for
eternity.
“It hath been said, Whosoever shall
put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: But I say unto
you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of
fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that
is divorced committeth adultery.” (Matthew 5:31-32)
Because the
law was limited to actions and could not produce true righteousness, it allowed
people to divorce and remarry, but Jesus said if they divorced, they place
their mate in position of potential lust and mental adultery. If the mate remarried, both she and the new
mate were guilty of adultery. He
addressed the issue again when the Pharisees asked his opinion on the subject
in Matthew 19:4-9.
“And he answered and said unto them,
Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and
female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall
cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one
flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
They say unto him, Why did Moses then
command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
He saith unto them, Moses because of
the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the
beginning it was not so. And I say unto
you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall
marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away
doth commit adultery.” (Matthew 19:4-9)
Divorce was
never part of God’s plan, and was not to be considered unless the mate had
committed adultery. To divorce for any
other reason and remarry was to commit adultery oneself, and whoever married
the divorced person was guilty of adultery because God has never given mankind
authority over marriage, either to marry them or to divorce them. He has kept that power for himself.
“Again, ye have heard that it hath
been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt
perform unto the Lord thine oaths: But I say unto you, Swear not at all;
neither by heaven; for it is God's throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his
footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because
thou canst not make one hair white or black. But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay,
nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.” (Matthew 5:33-37)
The law
forbade their perjuring themselves by breaking their oath. Jesus said they were not to take the oath in
the first place, because God, and not they had the final say in what
happened. They were to limit their
commitments to yes and no with no qualifying factors. To do more was sin.
James 4:13-16
addresses the same point. “Go to now, ye that say, Today or tomorrow we
will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get
gain: Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life?
It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.
For that ye ought to say, If the Lord
will, we shall live, and do this, or that. But now ye rejoice in your boastings: all such
rejoicing is evil. It is quite
arrogant to believe we can make such commitments without considering God. We can’t even control the things we use as a
basis for our oath. How can we even
consider taking such an oath?
No comments:
Post a Comment